With some practice and the use of actions it can be a pretty quick endeavor. People think that basic retouching needs to take a long time, but it doesn't. There is nothing that I know of that replaces dodging and burning, judicious use of the healing brush tool, and perhaps a tiny touch of frequency separation. Using it to smooth tonal transitions is awful no matter how lightly it's used. It works okay IF I dodge and burn beforehand. Maybe once in a very great while once or twice a year for a specific type job/shoot. Just applying a global one click application is going to result in awful results (in my opinion). The best use of them that I've seen is from those who do their due diligence first with good dodging and burning then apply the software, mask it out, and then selectively paint it in. I know photographers who use them all of the time to some degree or another. The original images shown in this review are straight from the camera, and retouches have been made solely with PortraitPro. All I can say is that I can almost always see when they've been used when looking at a photo. PortraitPro 18 is an alternative, which is what initially drew me to Anthropic’s PortraitPro Studio Max several years ago when I reviewed version 15. I don't have any personal experience with any of the mentioned programs. Today, I’ll be comparing three different pieces of software that. There seems to be so many portrait enhancement programs. by Bryan Striegler 11 Comments How many hours a day are you spending retouching portraits I'd guess too much. Can anyone tell me the difference about enhancement programs like Imagenomic Portraiture 2 and Portrait Professional Studio 10 and PortraitPro 15 Portable?Īre all of them good types of programs to have?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |